How does Blue Prism recommend managing the number of exception types?

Keeping the number of exception types minimal for ease of understanding is aligned with Blue Prism’s best practices. When exception types are limited, it simplifies the process of handling errors and allows users and administrators to quickly troubleshoot and resolve issues. A streamlined approach aids in maintaining clarity within workflows and reduces the cognitive load on users, making it easier for them to understand the nature of the exceptions and respond appropriately.

Moreover, a minimalistic approach encourages uniformity in exception handling, which is essential for consistent reporting and analysis across different processes. This practice helps ensure that teams can quickly familiarize themselves with the exception types in use, ultimately improving efficiency in managing robotic processes.

A higher number of exception types might lead to confusion and complexity, making it difficult for teams to determine the appropriate actions or understand the implications of each exception. Therefore, prioritizing clarity and ease of understanding in managing exceptions is key to effective process automation in Blue Prism.